Wednesday, 10 October 2007

The US-China Currency Dispute: Is a Rise in the Yuan Necessary, Inevitable or Desirable?

An interesting paper from John Tatom looking at US-Chinese relations specifically related to the valuation of the Yuan. This is a topic we have covered in depth in this blog. This is a useful addition to the debate.

He is correct to point out in the first line of the appendix that "China-bashing has become a popular US media and political sport."

From the abstract I would say that the author has made a good fist of addressing the key issues. The costs of floating must not be undereztiamted with any fall out potentially hitting the US far harder than currently envisaged.

I think this article is available vis free guest access.


John A. Tatom (2007) "The US-China Currency Dispute: Is a Rise in the Yuan Necessary, Inevitable or Desirable?", Global Economy Journal: Vol. 7: No. 3, Article 2.

China-bashing has become a popular US media and political sport. This is largely due to the US trade imbalance and the belief, by some, that China is responsible for it because it manipulates its currency to hold down the dollar prices of its goods, unfairly creating a trade advantage that has contributed to the loss of US businesses and jobs. This paper reviews the problem of the large trade imbalance that the United States has with China and its relationship to Chinese exchange rate policy. It examines the link between a Chinese renminbi appreciation and the trade balance and also whether a generalized dollar decline could solve the global or Chinese US trade imbalance. The consensus view explained here is that a renminbi appreciation is not likely to fix either the trade imbalance with China or overall. If these perceived benefits of a managed float are small or non-existent, then perhaps they should be pursued anyway because of small costs or even benefits for China. Section IV looks at the costs of a managed float in terms of the benefits of the earlier peg. Opponents of a fixed dollar/yuan exchange rate ignore the costs of a managed float for China, especially with limits on currency convertibility. These costs are outlined here in order to provide an economic basis for the earlier fixed rate and China's reluctance to appreciate. Finally it is suggested that the necessary convertibility on capital account, toward which China is moving, could easily result in yuan depreciation under a floating rate regime. This is hardly the end that China critics have in mind and it is not one that would improve US or other trade imbalances with China.


No comments: